Editorial standards

See how EarnPrism reviews content, fixes errors, and expands pages for clarity and usefulness.

Updated April 2026Content qualityCorrections & standards

What EarnPrism tries to do on every page

  • Use plain English and concrete examples.
  • Explain what the estimate is doing in practical terms.
  • Say what the page does not include or cannot know.
  • Link to the most useful next calculator or guide.

What gets corrected

Broken links, unclear assumptions, misleading copy, incorrect formulas, stale examples, and pages that drift away from the user problem they were built to solve should be corrected and re-reviewed.

What gets expanded

Pages are expanded when a topic needs stronger examples, clearer methodology notes, more relevant FAQs, better related links, more useful scenario framing, or a better connection between the estimate and the next decision.

What EarnPrism avoids on purpose

  • Fake precision when an estimate depends on user assumptions.
  • Heavy jargon where plain language does the job better.
  • Pages that chase keywords but do not help a real decision.
  • Thin related links that do not meaningfully move the user forward.